This blog has been rather silent over the past four years. As many know, after the last election, I accepted a job with Capital Ward Councillor Shawn Menard. I figured I’d spent so much time criticizing City Hall, it was time to put up or shut up, and try to make a difference. I’m proud of the work we’ve done there and the changes–some big, some small–we’ve achieved, but with that roll, extensive blogging seemed less appropriate…and I also had a lot less time to do it.
But the 2022 election is here, and so I’m back.
With this initial election post, I will offer this disclaimer: Yes, I work for Shawn. No, I don’t blog as part of my job, nor do I do this on company time. No, this blog is not part of Shawn’s campaign, nor are any of the topics directed by Shawn or his campaign. No, this blog is not part of any other campaign. Yes, I will volunteer for one or more campaigns (including Shawn’s). Yes, there are candidates in other races that I like. Yes, perhaps unshockingly, I have opinions about local politics that have been and will be shared on this blog. No, I don’t owe you anything.
All right, with that out of the way, let’s take an introductory dive into the campaign.
This could shape up to be a defining election in Ottawa for the coming decades. With some significant decisions looming (LRT, Lansdowne, the hospital…), climate change affecting many aspects of city life and politics, and the recent policy announcement by the province to implement a strong mayor system, the state of the city could be locked-in for the near- and medium-term, depending on the council we elect.
And there is a chance for significant change on council. We should have a new mayor (or an old but different one), with Bob Chiarelli, Catherine McKenney and Mark Sutcliffe all running. There are a number of councillors leaving, many with significant pull at City Hall: Diane Deans, Scott Moffatt, Jan Harder (though she’s hinted at running again), Keith Egli, Jean Cloutier and Mathieu Fleury have all said they wouldn’t run again; Catherine McKenney isn’t running for re-election as councillor (instead running for mayor); and some councillors haven’t officially retired, but haven’t registered yet, either (Rich Chiarelli and Eli El-Chantiry).
There are also a number of new candidates who are extremely promising, including Laura Shantz (Rideau-Vanier), Laine Johnson (College Ward), Sean Devine (Knoxdale-Merivale), Arieal Troster and Stuart MacKay (Somerset), Erin Coffin and Rouba Fattal (Kanata South), Wilson Lo (Barrhaven East), and Marty Carr (Alta Vista).
(That’s not an exhaustive list.)
Early in the campaign season, I worried there might not be that many strong challenges to sitting councillors–it can be hard to unseat an incumbent, though it usually happens a few times every election–but it’s looking like there could be strong challenges to sitting councillors in a few wards, including College (if Chiarelli runs, as he said he would), Barrhaven East, Kanata South, Osgoode (where former councillor Doug Thompson is challenging George Darouze) and maybe even Orleans South-Navan (formerly Cumberland Ward, where we have a two-person replay of the by-election, right now).
Now, these probably won’t all be competitive in the end, there are usually some promising campaigns that fizzle out, for whatever reason, but there’s potential for some good races, and throw in the extra council seat we have this term, and it could lead up to a bit a of a shake-up at the council table.
Here are some ward races that, right now, I’m particularly interested in:
College Ward: It is a shame that Emilie Coyle was unable to unseat Rick Chiarelli four years ago, though she came close, and that must have worried Chiarelli a bit. Not only was Coyle the better candidate, Chiarelli was determined to have committed numerous instances of sexual harassment by the Integrity Commissioner. That’s not the sort of person we want on council. This year, Laine Johnson has come out strong in the early stages of the campaign (admittedly, stronger than Coyle did four years ago). It’s hard to see how Chiarelli could increase his vote share this year (if he chooses to run), but there are other people in the race who could either take the seat, or split the vote and allow Chiarelli to hang on.
Rideau-Vanier: Mathieu Fleury has been a reliable councillor during his tenure, but I know there’s been a fair amount of discontent in the ward, as well. In the past two campaigns, he’s faced viable opponents, but he’s been able to face them down. Now that he’s decided to step back from city politics, this leaves a big opening. There’s potential for a new city leader to emerge out of this race.
Kanata South: Incumbent Allan Hubley has had pretty comfortable re-elections in the last two campaigns, but he’s been taking a beating in the press during the LRT inquiry. Hubley has done well to represent the views of his core voters, but he hasn’t done much to bring new ideas to the city or his ward. He hasn’t shown leadership, even as Transit Commission Chair, and it is possible he’s losing a bit of his shine with voters. He has three challengers right now, Coffin, Fattal and Bina Shah. It would seem that Fattal and Coffin are the strongest challengers, with Coffin having a bit more of a presence in the early days of the race. I can’t handicap this race, right now. Both Coffin and Fattal might make good challengers, but they could also split whatever anti-Hubley vote there is. Weaker incumbents tend to draw stronger fields, but stronger fields can benefit weaker incumbents.
Capital Ward: Well, I live here…but I probably won’t write about it too much.
Barrhaven East: Technically, this is the new ward, but it also has an incumbent. Carol Anne Meehan is running here. She’s been an embattled councillor. She’s made mistakes and I don’t think she’s accomplished what she set out to accomplish, but she’s also very good at being an avatar for her residents, emotionally. She’s their political id, and being able to channel the anger and outrage of voters can be successful…it’s also not the worst attribute in a councillor, but it’s also far from the best attribute.
Barrhaven West: The fact that Ward 3 won’t be represented by Jan Harder is really quite something. No more of her outbursts and insults. No more telling other councillors to shut up. Of all her qualities, it’s the racism that I’ll miss least of all. So a fresh race will bring a fresh face. This is not a community I’m particularly dialed into, so I don’t know the candidates. Jay Chadha is a city staffer (just like Wilson Lo in Barrhaven East), so that should give him an advantage in terms of knowledge of city operations, but there’s no great history of non-political city staffers successfully jumping over to the political side.
Osgoode: Hoo boy, this could get ugly. Doug Thompson was a popular councillor for Osgoode, winning 67% of the vote in his last election in 2010. In 2014, he backed George Darouze, in a thousand-person race, with a number of qualified candidates. Darouze won by about 400 votes, a small margin, sure, but scoring over 20% in that field was somewhat impressive. No doubt, Thompson’s backing helped.
Four years ago, there was chatter that Thompson was displeased with Darouze and that he was going to run again. That didn’t happen. Darouze remained fairly popular and scored over 50% of the vote against a rather weak field (though I still Kim Sheldrick would have been a fine councillor for Osgoode).
But is Councillor Darouze still popular? He hasn’t changed much over time, but he also hasn’t accomplished much. Sometimes, that’s okay. A populace that supports the status quo isn’t going to ask for much, and maybe that’s what Osgoode residents want. Maybe they just want to live their life without much doings by the city.
But this term has also been a bit more checkered. He was officially sanctioned by council, forced to give an apology for abusing his power office against a resident who works as a police officer. He’s had other online run-ins, was on a council zoom meeting while driving and, well, being a Watson acolyte might not be as beneficial this time around, especially with all the LRT news. None of it implicated Darouze, directly, but he’s been a dutiful foot soldier for the mayor.
So, does Thompson have any juice? Is the Darouze star falling? Is this campaign going to get really personal? We shall see…
Riverside South-Findlay Creek: This is CAM’s old ward. I’m not super interested in this race, but former councillor Steve Desroches is running, so that might be interesting, or it maybe not.
Somerset: This is only interesting because Catherine McKenney is running for mayor, and Somerset is likely to provide another strong voice at the council table. At this point, Troster seems like the lead candidate. She held a fairly prominent public persona coming into the race. She seems to have a lot of volunteers and community support. Most importantly, she’s been endorsed by the uber-popular McKenney. I’m not expecting a race here, but I do expect a lot of good ideas to come out of the campaign, and I would expect Troster to be a productive councillor next term.
Mayor: It’s kind of interesting. We’ve got three prominent candidates for mayor, and we have a bit of a Goldilocks situation going on. We’ve got a career politician coming out of retirement to run for mayor again; a two-term councillor seeking the mayoralty; and a newbie, a well-known media personality who’s never run for office or worked in city government, though he has covered municipal politics, in the past.
But that’s not all. Also with these three, we’ve got a nice spectrum, politically. Though there are no parties in municipal politics, judging on policies and track record, it’s fair to say we’ve got a left-wing candidate, a liberal candidate and a conservative candidate. Now, political philosophies function differently municipally than they do federally or provincially, but, still…
I don’t know what kind of machine Chiarelli still has behind him. He’s not the heir to the Watson throne (he’s been a consistent political foil). He hasn’t run for office recently. And his current online presence is almost comical (he’s put out 15-second videos asking questions like “is affordable housing important?” and “is transit important?”…and then he simply says, “yes, this is important.” No other other info. No policy proposals. It’s just…I don’t know man.)
Because of this, I’m inclined to see this as a race between Somerset Councillor Catherine McKenney and former radio host and columnist Mark Sutcliffe. McKenny has a built-in network of supporters and volunteers, coming off two successful council campaigns. Sutcliffe has high name recognition, is generally well-liked and has been conspicuously courting the Watson wing of council (including Matt Luloff, El-Chantiry and former councillor/current MPP Stephen Blais). Being a conservative who can lean on the Liberal machine will be a big benefit.
Now, we haven’t seen full platforms and policy proposals. Both have laid out their vision in an Ottawa Citizen op-ed. During their two terms in office, McKenney has proven to be a strong advocate for affordable housing, sustainable transportation, climate change preparedness and building an equitable city. Online, Sutcliffe has talked about keeping taxes and user fees low, spending more on police and fixing LRT (though he doesn’t say how). These last two items, of course, will be very expensive, and it’s not clear where he’ll get the money.
Chiarelli has, well, he has put out some priorities, though no real policies. He seems to want to maintain the status quo, while explicitly rejecting the acrimony and pettiness of the Watson regime. (Sutcliffe, subtly, is presenting himself as a kinder, gentler Jim Watson. Yes, he wears beige pants, but, come on, you know you like him.)
Oh yeah, Bernard Couchman is running again. I’m always okay with a Couchman campaign.