Lansdowne and Ottawa’s War on Pedestrians

Whenever someone suggests that Ottawa infrastructure needs to accommodate pedestrians or bikes a little bit better (or at all), there is typical response from certain folks decrying the so-called “War on Cars“. From this perspective, any attempt to slightly reduce the massively favoured status of cars–offering a bit of safety for other people–is a sinister plot destroy our very way of life.

Of course, this is absolute bullshit. There’s no war on cars, even if there should be. We build highways through communities. We spend millions to expand roads and build bridges. We subsidize driving and parking endlessly. Rideau Street is a bit of a death trap, yet with the recent re-design, we couldn’t make it safer for everyone; lord knows massive transport trucks have to go through downtown.

No, the real “war” is on pedestrians and cyclists. It is almost impossible to get proper infrastructure built. And even when it is built, the city doesn’t want to maintain it. In the recent budget debate, any spending on bike infrastructure would have to be discussed later, as a possible special project. Meanwhile, the road construction budget passed with nary a raised eyebrow. Our tribute to traffic must not be impeded.

The most recent example of this (at least, the most recent example I’ve noticed) comes from Lansdowne. I popped over to the park last night, and this is what I noticed on Marche Way:

IMG_1777Marche Way is a multi-use space. It is for cars, bikes and pedestrians. There are pedestrian-only sidewalks, but pedestrians are free to walk wherever they please, and drivers just have to learn how to deal with it.

And, to their credit, most drivers have. There was some initial idiocy (and there are still some people who seem to get lost in this “urban village”, and drive around aimlessly), but for the most part, drivers have learned that they can’t speed through Lansdowne. There will be people walking around, and they will have to defer to these people, rather than run them down.

But now the city has put large ugly lines and arrows on the brick street. If you look at the street now, it really looks like something that was built for cars. All the paint signals that this is where cars get to be, and everyone else needs to stay out of the way.

(It’s also really ugly. I know that’s not as big a deal as safety, but we’re trying to build nice, welcoming public spaces, and aesthetics matter. Also, this paint isn’t going to increase anyone’s safety. It’ll likely just lead to more aggressive driving.)

What is perhaps most comical/sad/depressing is the need to include the arrows. This is basically a statement declaring that drivers won’t know that they can only turn right. They won’t be able to see the median in the middle of Bank Street blocking a left-hand turn, and they won’t understand the sign in the middle of that median telling them they can only turn right. Basically, this paint says that the city thinks Ottawa drivers are morons.

Hopefully, this will be a short-lived situation. Lansdowne won’t survive as a haven for cars. It’s on a major bus line and it’s in a very walkable and bike-able neighbourhood. If anything, we should just be banning cars from the grounds completely. It’d make for a much nicer space, and it would better live up to the promises made by OSEG and the city.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Lansdowne and Ottawa’s War on Pedestrians

  1. I think the lines are there as a result of complaints the City has received. The lack of markings etc. was supposed to be the introduction of a new, more balanced distribution of the public space that has worked well other places. Unfortunately people didn’t get it right away, so they have reacted by painting lines on the road. As you say, not a good development. If we can blame them for anything, it is reacting too quickly to the vocal minority who complained.

  2. I am very curious how the whole thing with Lansdowne will develop in the coming years. The pessimist in me tells me that Lansdowne will turn into a common shopping mall with a sports arena attached. A lack of visitors made that move unavoidable and also resulted in a tremendous increase of parking space on and off site. OSEG put the City before the alternative either to accomodate them with a new parking policy or fear to go bankrupt.

    The optimist hopes that the City accomodates all those people who want to visit Lansdowne with a means of transportation which is theoratically used by everyone anytime. (Maybe a street car looping from Preston along QE Driveway instead of car traffic.)

  3. Would be curious to hear your views on pedestrian access to the park off the canal. It’s… noticeably un-inviting. Cause it’s not like the canal pathways are a major pedestrian cycling arterial throughout the summer. Nahhh.

    • It’s horrible. HORRIBLE.

      First, the path on the Lansdowne side of the canal isn’t well-maintained (or maintained at all in the winter). If you’re heading from Fifth, the first entrance you come to is a wide car entrance with little-to-no-space for pedestrians (or cyclists). It also dumps you where the exit to the parking lot is. The rest of the entrances don’t really entice you to come in. You don’t even always notice they’re there.

      The original purpose of Lansdowne was to fix up the area around the canal and give the city access to it. Currently, the NCC says they want to revitalize the canal. Integrating Lansdowne with the canal pathways would be a huge plus. (Getting rid of the QED and extending access right to the canal would be best, but that’s another issue.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s